We would like to comment on TEMPO's editorial response to our letter (February 25 edition). TEMPO said: "It is true that Vico did not directly embrace, but through the process you described, the worker's demands were eventually fulfilled."

The above explanation is inaccurate and so disturbing that it needs straightening out. Please read the Decision of P4D (Committee of Settlement of Labor Disputes) No. 57-20/07/XVIII/PHI/I-2001, as