Palmer Refutes

April 24, 2001

We reject the TEMPO article Sweeping Clean (April 16). On page 48 it stated: In February 2000, the district court judge ruled in favor of Indomaz, although only awarding US$ 477,000 in damages. Nestle failed to file a request for appeal within the permissible 14-day limit, but filed its request one day after the deadline had expired. The court rejected the request.

This is absolutely untrue. The South Jakarta District Court never rejected Nestl

...

More Articles