Protecting One’s Own
The Attorney General’s Office’s decision on the involvement of Cirus Sinaga was too hastily made. It was counterproductive and underestimated the people’s sense of justice.
October 13, 2010
THE news from the Attorney General’s Office came as no surprise, but it was a bitter pill to swallow. As expected, the AGO announced last week that prosecutor Cirus Sinaga had not committed any crime when he removed corruption and money laundering from the list of offenses on the charge sheet of Gayus Tambunan. It was bitter because the decision was clearly made in haste, as if it was driven by the desire to save a colleague.
In June, the poli
...