maaf email atau password anda salah

A Constitutional Court Backslide

Tuesday, September 13, 2016

Recordings, unless they are carried out by law enforcement officers, are now inadmissible as evidence in court. This will make uncovering corruption a harder proposition.

arsip tempo : 178038698618.

. tempo : 178038698618.

THE Constitutional Court ruling following a review of the regulations for electronic recordings is a major step backward. Now it will be harder for the public to uncover crimes, including corruption, without using recordings. Voice or video recordings will no longer be admissible as evidence if they are not carried out by law enforcement officers.

The petition for a reexamination was submitted by Setya Novanto, former speaker of the House of Rep

...

Subscribe to continue reading.
We craft news with stories.

For the benefits of subscribing to Digital Tempo, See More

The Best Choice

Rp 750.000/12 months

  • *Flexible payment methods
  • *Unlimited access to Tempo Plus & Tempo Magz

Rp 386.280/6 months

  • *Auto-renews every 6 months
  • *Cancel at anytime
  • *Unlimited access to Tempo Plus & Tempo Magz

See Other Packages

Already a Subscribed? Log in here
To receive daily news by Email, Sign up for Tempo ID.

More Articles

More exclusive contents

  • June 1, 2026

  • May 25, 2026

  • May 18, 2026

  • May 11, 2026

Independent journalism needs public support. By subscribing to Tempo, you will contribute to our ongoing efforts to produce accurate, in-depth and reliable information. We believe that you and everyone else can make all the right decisions if you receive correct and complete information. For this reason, since its establishment on March 6, 1971, Tempo has been and will always be committed to hard-hitting investigative journalism. For the public and the Republic.

Login Subscribe