ROWS of bottles and cans of alcohol fill a cooler in a shop near Sudirman railway station in South Jakarta. They come in different brands, and their prices vary, from 'only' Rp19,000 to Rp80,000. The liquor stand side by side with soft drinks. There is no notice indicating who may and who may not purchase the item.
THE five judges took turns reading out the verdict in the corruption case of disgraced Constitutional Court Chief Justice Akil Mochtar on Monday last week. It took them more than six hours to get through the entire document. Finally at around 10:30pm, the panel of judges presided over by Suwidya Abdullah announced its final decision: life behind bars for Akil. It was the harshest punishment ever handed out to a graft convict in Indonesia.
The late evening discussion took place at the headquarters of Projo (short for "Pro-Jokowi") in Pancoran, South Jakarta, in early June. There were only four participants, and the discussion was held a day after the Joko Widodo-Jusuf Kalla and Prabowo Subianto-Hatta Rajasa presidential tickets received their serial numbers at the General Election Commission (KPU) office.
THE sound of the siren broke the night's silence at the gate of the Jakarta International School (JIS) Kindergarten on Friday two weeks ago. Dozens of police officers stood guard on each corner of the intersection at Pondok Indah, South Jakarta. The sirens paused for a moment, then began to wail again. It went on like that for more than half an hour. "It sounded like there was a war coming," Abdul Hamid, who lives not far from the JIS complex, told Tempo last week.
THE SITE appears inconspicuous, if centrally located, on Jalan Sudirman in Central Jakarta, next to Bank Negara Indonesia's head office in the capital's downtown business district. Mostly empty, it serves as a parking lot by those who frequent the lone Arthaloka Building that stands on it.
IN THE WAKE of the Constitutional Court's severe curtailing of the House of Representatives' (DPR) power to select its justices, a new suit has been brought before the court that seeks to further mitigate lawmakers' authority over law enforcement institutions. This time it is the DPR's jurisdiction over who sits on the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and the Judicial Commission (KY) that is under scrutiny.
One of the House of Representatives' (DPR) powers that has been singled out as a major tool for corruption has finally been trimmed back. On Thursday two weeks ago, the Constitutional Court did away with the DPR's authority to 'hold back' and control technicalities in the use of budget funds.
Independent journalism needs public support. By subscribing to Tempo, you will contribute to our ongoing efforts to produce accurate, in-depth and reliable information. We believe that you and everyone else can make all the right decisions if you receive correct and complete information. For this reason, since its establishment on March 6, 1971, Tempo has been and will always be committed to hard-hitting investigative journalism. For the public and the Republic.